NEH Summer Institute

blurb

Epic Questions II: Mind, Meaning and Morality,

a NEH Summer Institute for High School Teachers, July 8-August 2, 2013

Mitchell Green, Director.

NEHUVa Philosophy

Director’s Welcome

Dear Colleague,

Thank you for your interest in becoming an NEH Summer Scholar at the upcoming Summer Institute in Philosophy entitled Epic Questions II: Mind, Meaning and Morality, to be held from July 8 to August 4 at the University of Virginia. In what follows you will find more details about the Institute, which we hope will be stimulating, informative and enjoyable. Please don’t hesitate to contact me should you have further questions. We hope you’ll apply to join us here at U.Va.!

Sincerely,
  • Mitchell S. Green
  • NEH/Horace Goldsmith
  • Distinguished Teaching Professor
  • Department of Philosophy
  • University of Virginia

(¤) Any views, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this program do not necessarily reflect those of the National Endowment for the Humanities.

(collapse and return to top)

Aims and Scope

The Epic Questions Institute aims to support the teaching of philosophy in American high schools by means of a four-week, intensive exposure to some of the main topics within the field. I, together with my Associate Director, Jennifer Gurley, and five Visiting Lecturers (Professor John Arras, Professor Alisa Carse, Professor Mara Harrell, Professor Trenton Merricks, Professor Rebecca Stangl,), will lead and facilitate discussions on these topics, provide reading and writing assignments, and support the development of course syllabi. Our work will be further enhanced by our On-Site Coordinator, Mr. Corin Fox. We hope thereby to provide NEH Summer Scholars with the knowledge, skills, materials and confidence to return to their schools with an heightened ability to incorporate philosophy into their teaching. We are eager to serve secondary-level teachers from public, private, parochial, and home-school contexts, from all geographical areas within the U.S., and from a wide variety of backgrounds. No previous formal training in philosophy is required for eligibility. I am honored and excited to partner with the aforementioned colleagues and the National Endowment for the Humanities in order to make this Institute possible.

The rationale for this Institute is as follows. For many years I have been struck by the contrast between American and European approaches to teaching philosophy at the secondary level. While philosophy is quite commonly taught in European high schools (particularly those in Germany, France, Italy and the Low Countries), it tends to be the exception rather than the norm in American high schools. Not all aspects of European philosophical pedagogy merit transplanting here; yet I believe that so long as our students can engage actively with philosophy, they can benefit from it. In particular, such active engagement can help our students:

  1. cultivate the skills of constructing and critically assessing lines of reasoning, and
  2. enter into conversation with the major figures of my field (both past and present), and thereby
  3. develop confidence and skill at grappling with some of the hardest and most compelling questions that a reflective person can ask.

The above three aims inspired me in 2009 to found the High-Phi Project, which, as the name suggests, supports the teaching of philosophy in American high schools. Such teaching need not take the form of a full-semester course in philosophy. While such courses are valuable, many schools lack the resources to offer them. Rather, the High-Phi Project is equally enthusiastic about supporting teachers who teach more standard subjects (English, Math, History, etc.) but would like to incorporate philosophical inquiry into their syllabi. Say for instance that you teach English literature and regularly cover a novel in which a character confronts a moral dilemma. How can you guide your students into a reflective discussion of what that character should or might do that goes beyond the venting of subjective opinions? Or suppose you are a science teacher who would like to discuss with students what it means to confirm a theory even when the available evidence leaves open the possibility that it may be mistaken in some way? How, by means of such a discussion, can you guide your students to appreciate the difference between dogma and knowledge? The High-Phi Project aims to support you in these and like endeavors, and the Epic Questions Institute puts that aim into action.

The Institute will run for four weeks on the grounds of the beautiful and historic University of Virginia, founded by Thomas Jefferson. A more detailed schedule is available in a table below, but the basic format is as follows: in each of the four five-day working weeks, two faculty experts will lead discussions for the first four days. One will lead discussion on Monday/Tuesday, and another will lead discussion on Wednesday/Thursday. Friday will be set aside for you to work independently or in small groups to incorporate what you have learned into a syllabus or course unit. That work will be carried out within easy reach of the faculty members who have led discussions on earlier days of that week, so that you may consult with them as further questions arise. I will also be on hand throughout each week to answer questions.

(¤) Any views, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this program do not necessarily reflect those of the National Endowment for the Humanities.

(collapse and return to top)

Methods and Subjects of Study

Philosophy is most inspiring and exciting when approached as an ongoing conversation to which all are invited to participate. This is in contrast to a method in which students are simply taught the views of the great philosophers of the past. While this latter method has its value, it tends to encourage students to treat philosophy as something to observe rather than as something to do. Instead, by inviting our students to approach philosophy as a living, evolving discipline, I believe we better equip them to reap its benefits. This why the visiting lecturers, our Associate Director (described below), and I have chosen the following areas and topics for the Institute:

Areas and Topics

  • Logical Theory: Argument construction, fallacies, method of counterexamples, conceptual analysis, conceivability and possibility
  • Metaphysics: Free Will, Personal Identity
  • Philosophy of Language: Meaning, Truth, Presupposition, Pragmatics
  • Epistemology (Theory of Knowledge): Rationalism, Empiricism, Skepticism
  • Philosophy of Mind: Consciousness, the Mind-Body Problem
  • Ethics: Virtue Ethics, Utilitarianism, Deontology
  • Political Philosophy: Justice, Theories of Rights, Political Obligation
  • Bioethics: Research Ethics, Healthcare Ethics

A list of readings will not be finalized until we have a profile of our group of NEH Summer Scholars for 2013. However, all participants will be sent a copy of and asked to read my book, Engaging Philosophy: A Brief Introduction (Hackett Publishing Co.) before arriving on the University of Virginia campus in July. This text was written as a gentle introduction to philosophy that familiarizes readers with the some of the major issues and techniques in the field. In addition, soon after our reading list is made final, we will provide copies of all remaining readings in either hard or electronic copy, depending on the preference of each incoming Summer Scholar.

(¤) Any views, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this program do not necessarily reflect those of the National Endowment for the Humanities.

(collapse and return to top)

Core Faculty

Mitchell Green
  • Mitchell Green (Director),
  • rofessor of Philosophy, University of Virginia. Ph.D., University of Pittsburgh. Green works in the areas of philosophy of language, aesthetics, the philosophy of mind, and the evolution of communication. He currently directs the High-Phi Project, which supports philosophical education in American high schools. In spring of 2013, he will offer his course, ‘Know Thyself’ as a MOOC (Massive Online Open Course) through Coursera.
Jennifer Gurley
  • Jennifer Gurley (Associate Director),
  • Associate Professor of English at Le Moyne College. Ph.D., U.C. Berkeley. Gurley specializes in American literature (especially the Transcendentalists), philosophy before 1900, and classical philosophy and rhetoric. In all her courses, she explores the relationships between literature and philosophy and discusses the different kinds of reading practices that different forms of writing demand. She is currently teaching a course organized around the question “Why Do Humans Write?,” supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities Enduring Questions Program, that considers the social and psychological effects of writing technologies from Mesopotamia to the digital age. Gurley just completed a basic English grammar that hopes to revive the art of sentence diagramming, and she is finishing a book on Ralph Waldo Emerson as a religious writer.
John Arras
  • John Arras (Visiting Lecturer),
  • Porterfield Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Professor of Philosophy, University of Virginia. Ph.D., Northwestern University. Professor Arras works in the areas of justice and healthcare, case-based reasoning, physician-assisted suicide, research ethics, and public health. He currently serves on the President’s Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues.
Alisa Carse
  • Alisa Carse (Visiting Lecturer),
  • Associate Professor of Philosophy at Georgetown University. Ph.D., University of Pittsburg. Carse is the James F. Slevin Senior Fellow for Teaching and Pedagogy at the Center for Social Justice, Research, Teaching and Service, and a Teaching Affiliate of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics. Her teaching and research are centered in moral philosophy, social and political theory, moral psychology, and gender theory. Her current research explores cultural, moral, and political subordination and its antidotes. She is interested in particular in exploring the repercussions of subordination for individual and group identity, effective moral agency, and – correlatively – how we best conceive the nature and limits of liberty. In a related series of projects, she is examining the role of key affiliative virtues (e.g., empathy, imagination, trust and trustworthiness, respectful curiosity) in achieving justice, individual moral resilience, and morally healthy forms of sociality and solidarity.
Mara Harrell
  • Mara Harrell (Visiting Lecturer),
  • Associate Teaching Professor of Philosophy at Carnegie Mellon. Ph.D., University of California San Diego. Harrell graduated with a B.A. in Physics from Pomona College in 1992. She then received an M.S. in Physics in 1996, and her Ph.D. in 2000 in Philosophy and Science Studies at UCSD. She was the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Colorado College before coming to Carnegie Mellon University in 2003. Mara Harrell’s research interests include philosophy of science, philosophy of physics, epistemology, educational technology, and educational research.
Trenton Merricks
  • Trenton Merricks (Visiting Lecturer),
  • Professor of Philosophy, University of Virginia. Ph.D., University of Notre Dame. Professor Merricks’ main field is metaphysics, and he has further interests in philosophy of religion, epistemology, philosophy of mind, and philosophy of language. For 2008-10 Professor Merricks held the Cavaliers’ Distinguished Teaching Professorship at U.Va. He has written two books: Objects and Persons, and Truth and Ontology.
Rebecca Stangl
  • Rebecca Stangl (Visiting Lecturer),
  • Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Virginia. Ph.D., Notre Dame. Stangl specializes in contemporary ethical theory and bioethics. Recent articles in ethical theory include “Asymmetrical Virtue Particularism,” Ethics; “A Dilemma for Particularist Virtue Ethics,” Philosophical Quarterly; and “Particularism and the Point of Moral Principles,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. Her work in bioethics has appeared in The Hastings Center Report and the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. Professor Stangl is currently at work on a book called Aristotelian Autonomy, and will be on research leave for the AY 2012-13. This research is supported by a grant from The Character Project at Wake Forest University, sponsored by The Templeton Foundation. She was also a recipient of The University of Virginia’s 2012 All-University Teaching Award.

In addition to the above “core” faculty, we will also have on hand an advanced graduate student who will support our efforts:

Corin Fox
  • Corin Fox, (Ph.D. Candidate, Philosophy, University of Virginia)
  • will serve as On-Site Coordinator for the Institute. Corin’s current research is on the vagueness of natural language and its relation to logic. His main areas of interest include philosophy of language, logic, and philosophical pedagogy. He has also taught introductory courses in the philosophy of religion and epistemology. Corin has worked as graduate research assistant to Mitch Green since 2009 on a National Science Foundation funded project on the philosophical aspects of language evolution.

(collapse and return to top)

Applicant Profile

Full-time teachers in American high schools, whether public, charter, independent, or religiously affiliated, as well as home-schooling parents, are eligible to apply to the Epic Questions Institute. Americans citizens teaching abroad are also eligible if a majority of the students they teach are also American citizens. Librarians and school administrators may also be eligible as space permits. We seek a diverse group of participants, both geographically, culturally, and in terms of the kinds of schools represented. Further, no previous formal training in philosophy is required. Moreover, and has been emphasized above, we are eager to support not only teachers aiming to teach a full-term philosophy course, but also those teaching non-philosophy courses but who would like to incorporate philosophical pedagogy into their classrooms. Finally, as a new initiative, the NEH allows us to admit up to three graduate students currently enrolled in Philosophy doctoral programs who are seriously considering a career in teaching at the secondary level.

(collapse and return to top)

Meeting Schedule and Assignments

Each day of the Institute will divide into morning (9 am to noon) and afternoon (1:30 to 5 pm) sessions. On Mondays through Thursdays, the morning session will be broken into two parts, the first of which will be an hour-long discussion led by myself on some core topic in philosophy: logic, fallacies, conceptual analysis, argument construction, the method of counterexamples, varieties of meaning, etc. The second part of the morning session (10 am to noon) will be led by a Visiting Lecturer who will speak for two hours (with one or more breaks during that period) on a topic in his or her area of expertise. We will break for ninety minutes each day for lunch, and this will be followed by a second presentation by the Visiting Lecturer (1:30-3:30 pm). After a half-hour break (3:30-4 pm) we will convene for a roundtable discussion led by Green, Jennifer Gurley, and the day’s Visiting Lecturer (4-5 pm).

Fridays will be devoted to curriculum development. In the mornings of these days (9 am to noon), teachers will use the resources of the Scholar’s Lab in Alderman Library, or whatever other milieu they prefer, to develop curricula reflecting what they have learned from the previous four days. After a lunch break, participants will divide into groups of five in order to present their results and receive comments from others. Visiting Lecturers who have taught earlier in that week will make themselves available that day to review newly drafted syllabi, and to answer any questions that the teachers may have.

Epic Questions NEH Summer Institute Schedule 2013

Reading List

Before their arrival in Charlottesville for the Epic Questions Institute, all Summer Scholars will be asked to read Engaging Philosophy: A Brief Introduction (Hackett Publishing, 2006), by Mitchell Green. A free copy will be mailed to all Summer Scholars in May.

The readings listed below will be posted on a website at the University of Virginia, and all NEH Summer Scholars will have free online access to it and its contents. (Please note that this list is subject to change.)

Arguments, Fallacies, Validity

Mara Harrell (Carnegie Mellon)

  • 07/08: Argument Diagraming (am), and Software: Using the iLogos Tool (pm)
  • Twardy, C. R. (2004) Argument Maps Improve Critical Thinking. Teaching Philosophy 27: 95–116.
  • Mara Harrell’s Online Course Modules 1 & 2.
  • 07/09: Types of Arguments (am), and Validity and Cogency (pm)
  • Van Gelder, T. J. (2001) How to improve critical thinking using educational technology. In G. Kennedy, M. Keppell, C. McNaught & T. Petrovic (Eds.), Meeting at the Crossroads. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. (pp. 539-548). Melbourne: Biomedical Multimedia Unit, The University of Melbourne.
  • Mara Harrell’s Online Course Module 3.
  • 07/10: Fallacies (am & pm)
  • Harrell, M. (2008) No Computer Program Required: Even Pencil-and-Paper Argument Mapping Improves Critical Thinking Skills. Teaching Philosophy, 31: 351-374.
  • Mara Harrell’s Handout 1.
  • Mara Harrell’s Handout 2.
  • 07/11: Tests for Validity (am), and Tests for Cogency (pm)
  • Mara Harrell’s Handout 3.
  • Mara Harrell’s Handout 4.

Metaphysics

Trenton Merricks (University of Virginia)

  • 07/15: Freedon of the Will (am & pm)
  • Van Inwagen, Peter, “The Powers of Rational Beings: Freedom of the Will,” Chapter 12 of his Metaphysics, 3rd edition (Westview Press, 2008).
  • David Lewis, ‘Are We Free to Break the Laws?’ Theoria 47: 113-121.
  • 07/16: Personal Identity (am & pm)
  • Bernard Williams “The Self and the Future,” Philosophical Review 79 (1970), pp. 161-180.
  • Derek Parfit “Personal Identity,” Philosophical Review 80 (1971) pp. 3-27.
  • Perry, A Dialogue on Personal Identity and Immortality (Hackett).

Epistemology and Philosophy of Mind

Mitch Green (University of Virginia)

  • 07/17: Mind/Body Problem (am & pm)
  • Tim Crane (1999) “The Mind-Body Problem”. MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science.
  • Rene Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy (Hackett).
  • David Papineau (2002) “The Case for Materialism”. From chapter 1 of Papineau, Thinking about Consciousness.
  • 07/18: Consciousness (am & pm)
  • Frank Jackson (1982) “Epiphenomenal Qualia”. Philosophical Quarterly 32: 127–136.
  • Gilbert Ryle, The Concept of Mind (selections) (Chicago).
  • Thomas Nagel (1986) “Mind”. Chapter 2 of Nagel, The View from Nowhere.

Philosophy Through Literature

Jennifer Gurley (Le Moyne College)

  • 07/22: Philosophy through Literature and Literary Examples 1 (am & pm)
  • Iris Murdoch, “Literature and Philosophy: A Conversation with Bryan Magee”; “The Novelist as Metaphysician”; “The Fire and the Sun: Why Plato Banished the Artists”
  • Kenneth Burke, Rhetoric of Motives: “Four Master Tropes”
  • William Faulkner, “The Sound and the Fury”
  • Aldous Huxley, “Brave New World”
  • 07/23: Philosophy through Literature and Literary Examples 2 (am & pm)
  • Ralph Waldo Emerson, “The Poet”
  • Edgar Allan Poe, “The Philosophy of Composition”
  • Martha Nussbaum, Poetic Justice: preface; Chapter One, “Rational Emotions”; Chapter Four, “Poets as Judges”; Upheavals of Thought: “Introduction”
  • Charles Altieri, The Particulars of Rapture :”Martha Nussbaum’s Upheavals of Thought and the Limits of Normative Theory”
  • William Shakespeare, Macbeth (selections)
  • Emily Dickinson, ‘I’ll tell you how the sun rose”; “Perception of an Object Costs”; “I felt a Cleaving in my Mind”; “There’s a Certain Slant of Light”; “Essential Oils – are rung”; “Renunciation is a Piercing Virtue”
  • Toni Morrison, “Beloved” (selections)
  • Sapphire, “Push”

Virtue Ethics

Rebecca Stangl (University of Virginia)

  • 07/24: Virtue Theory (am & pm)
  • Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics (selections)
  • Louden, “On Some Vices of Virtue Ethics”
  • Hursthouse, “Right Action”
  • 07/25: Utilitarianism and its Problems (am), and Deontology and its Problems (pm)
  • Mill, “Utilitarianism”
  • Williams, “A Critique of Utilitarianism”
  • Railton, “Alienation, Consequentalism, and the Demands of Morality”
  • Kant, “The Groundwork of the Metaphyiscs of Morals” (selections)
  • Scheffler, “Agent-Centered Restrictions, Rationality, and the Virtues”

Social and Political Philosophy

Alisa Carse (Georgetown University)

  • 07/29: Why Have States? (am), and Political Obligation (pm)
  • Simmons, “Political Philosophy”, chapters 1-3
  • Plato, “Crito”
  • 07/30: Justice (am), and Legitimacy (pm)
  • Simmons, “Political Philosophy”, chapters 4 and 6
  • Rawls, “A Theory of Justice” (selections)

Bioethics

John Arras (University of Virginia)

  • 07/31: Obligations to Distant Needy (am), and Morality of Abortion (pm)
  • Peter Singer, “Rich and Poor” (from Practical Ethics)
  • James Fishkin, from The Limits of Obligation, 20-24, 70-79
  • Onora O’Neill, “Ending World Hunger”
  • Lief Wenar, “Responsibility and Severe Poverty”
  • John Noonan, “An (Almost) Absolute Value in History”
  • Mary Ann Warren, “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion”
  • L.W. Sumner, “A Defense of the Moderate Position”
  • Judith Jarvis Thomson, “A Defense of Abortion”
  • Naomi Wolf, “Our Bodies, Our Souls”
  • 08/01: Euthanasia (am), and Enhancing Human Beings (pm)
  • President’s Council on Bioethics, “Beyond Therapy—General Reflections” (ch. 6 of Beyond Therapy)
  • Michael Sandel, “The Case against Perfection”
  • Allen Buchanan, “Human Nature and Enhancement”
  • Frances Kamm, “Is There a Problem with Enhancement?”
  • James Rachels, “Active and Passive Euthanasia”
  • Thomas Sullivan, “Active and Passive Euthanasia: An Impertinent Distinction?
  • Timothy Quill, Rebecca Dresser, Dan Brock, “The Rule of Double Effect – A Critique of Its Role in End-of-Life Decision Making”
  • Timothy E. Quill, “Death and Dignity: A Case of Individualized Decision Making”
  • John D. Arras, “Physician-Assisted Suicide: A Tragic View”
  • Timothy E. Quill, “Palliative Options of Last Resort”

(collapse and return to top)

Accomodations and Stipends

Accomodations

They may be housed in Brown Residential College (pictured below), located in the heart of the U.Va. campus and a two minute walk to the Department of Philosophy, where all seminars and lectures will be held. In Brown College, each participant will have his or her own bedroom, which is part of a larger suite. Such suites each contain two rooms adjoined to one, two, or three other suites via a common bathroom. All suites are air-conditioned, and come furnished with two captain’s beds with six drawers, two closets, four overhead shelves, two desks with bookcases, two chairs, individual connections to the University’s computer network, phone service with voice mail, and basic cable at an additional charge.

More information is available at the Brown College website: http://www.virginia.edu/browncollege/index.php?page=front

Accomodations

Institute participants may instead choose to reside in Lambeth Field Apartments (pictured below). Located about two blocks north of Central Grounds, all 174 apartments in the 24 buildings of Lambeth Field contain either two or three double-occupancy bedrooms. Each apartment is air-conditioned and has 1½ or 2 baths, a living room and kitchen with stove, refrigerator and sink. Apartments are furnished with a sofa, two arm chairs, coffee table, two end tables with lamps, and dining table with chairs. Free basic cable service is included in the living room. The complex provides laundry machines, a vending area, and a convenience store. Lambeth Apartments are about a fifteen to twenty minute walk from the Department of Philosophy, or a short bus ride on the campus shuttle bus.

More information on Lambeth Field Apartments is available at: http://www.virginia.edu/housing/options.php?id=lambeth

Accomodations

Stipend

A stipend of $3300.00 will be given to each NEH Summer Scholar. This will be paid in two equal parts, one upon your arrival in Charlottesville, and the other upon the close of the Institute. Please note that we strongly encourage NEH Summer Scholars to reside at Brown College between July 8 and August 4, and if you choose to do so, payment for room, board and parking on campus will be deducted from your stipend. We do not yet know the exact rates for Brown College for that period, but based on recent numbers we expect four weeks of room, board and on-campus parking to total approximately $1200.00. This amount will be deducted from the stipend for those who choose to reside in Brown College. Accordingly, and working with the $1200.00 figure for the time being, this would mean that Institute participants who reside in Brown College will be given the first half of $2100.00 ($3300-$1200) upon their arrival in Charlottesville, and the second half at the close of the Institute, conditional upon their full and satisfactory participation therein. [Rates for room and board are subject to confirmation.]

(collapse and return to top)

Testimonials

“The Epic Questions Institute is the most intellectually engaging endeavor I’ve participated in since graduate school; I can say with certainty that I’m better teacher because of it. My curriculum is more rigorous, and I’ve seen my students rise to the occasion as I’ve implemented more and more philosophy into my classes. Students love being able to ask big questions and search for answers, and in attending the Epic Questions Institute, I’ve learned how to engage them in this process.”

  • Beth Lifson,
  • Center for Advanced Learning,
  • Portland, Oregon

“I thought that the Institute was excellent. I’m still working to employ all the things I learned while I was there. …I loved the experience. I learned a ton about how to introduce philosophy to newcomers, and UVa is beautiful.”

“The Epic Questions Institute was both challenging and exceptionally rewarding.  Whether you are a beginner in philosophy or a graduate student in the field, it offers valuable substance for all.  The teachers in my group were quite diverse in their exposure to the various topics, but we all knew what we were getting from the Institute was truly valuable.  With the Common Core’s emphasis on argumentation, the thinking encouraged by Mitch Green and his colleagues will be all the more important in the classroom.  I would love to do it all again.  U.Va. and Charlottesville are a treat too.”

  • Thomas Barnes,
  • Dorman High School, Spartanburg, SC

“My experience at the NEH “Epic Questions” Summer Institute for Teachers at the University of Virginia was very rewarding personally and professionally. Prof. Mitch Green put together a wonderful short course on key philosophical issues and invited captivating, dynamic guest lecturers to lead us thirty or so participants into serious dialogue with not only the older philosophical tradition but also with those contemporary thinkers who are making news in philosophical reflection. He also built lessons on logic and notation into the daily meetings so that those of us who lacked that experience would go home with some logic literacy. The classroom discussions were always exciting– a testament to the high quality of interest and background of the teachers selected to participate –and discussions often spilled over into lunches and dinners and other contexts in which we enjoyed each other’s company. Another valuable aspect of the course was Prof. Green’s concern to relate what we were studying to the challenges that we teachers actually face in our classrooms as we try to bring elementary and secondary students to a deeper awareness of the philosophical enterprise. With regard to the general cultural and historical opportunities afforded by the university, Charlottesville and the surrounding area, I found it always hard to decide which opportunity for exploration to pursue on the weekends.

“Since returning from the seminar, I have found that it made me a better high school history teacher by having acquainted me more intimately with some of the key philosophical issues with which all human societies wrestle in some fashion. I am better able to articulate some of the critical philosophical and political views that have emerged over time and better informed about the contemporary scene, always what most immediately affects my students. I am also the advisor for my high school’s philosophy club, and participation in the Epic Questions seminar gave me a multitude of new ideas and viewpoints to share with my young philosophers. Some of the sources Mitch and my fellow participants shared with me have been used in every class I have taught and at every meeting of our philosophy club held since I returned from Virginia.

“Finally, I enjoyed meeting and working with my fellow participants at the seminar. Not only were they a highly engaging group of charming individuals, but it was enormously profitable professionally to spend three weeks thinking and talking to other teachers who think about these same issues and teach young people how to join in that reflection in their classrooms. I picked up a lot of great ideas and strategies for communicating my ideas and interests to my students. It was a rich experience I can heartily recommend to all teachers who apply.”

  • Robert L. Breckenridge,
  • Social Studies Department at Lincoln Academy,
  • Newcastle, Maine

“1. I really liked Mitch Green.  He was very responsive to the group’s needs.  I also appreciated how well organized the Institute was.  I enjoyed the hiking trip/restaurant experience and the outing to Monticello.  Reading Mitch’s book, Engaging Philosophy, before coming to the Institute was extremely helpful, essential for someone like me who had less background experience than other Institute participants who teach philosophy.

“2. I really like the visiting professors and how we got a taste of different branches of philosophy.  Each professor stretched my thinking. And, as a side benefit, I picked up some pedagogical tricks from watching the various professors teach.

“3. I found the other Institute participants interesting and inspiring.  I really enjoyed the group discussions and hearing various participants’ viewpoints.

“4. I realized the importance of being able to back up one’s thinking with “proofs.”  I am better able to spot fallacious reasoning.

“5. In my own teaching, I do a better job of asking students to support their positions and to gently challenge positions that are illogical.  I have engaged my high school freshmen with Pascal’s Wager as a result of the Institute.”

  • Judith McDonald,
  • John F. Kennedy Catholic High School,
  • Seattle, Washington

“Diversity of the 2011 group in terms of age, gender, level of teaching, and knowledge of philosophy proved to be a real strength. Teachers from middle school, high school, college, and even a prison program added a wide range of experience and perspective to the discussions and cooperative lesson planning sessions.  Some of the participants brought considerable knowledge of philosophy to the program, some very little, but everyone, regardless of prior knowledge, felt completely and comfortably included in all parts of the program.

“The seminar inspired me to design a a philosophy course with a colleague at my high school which will include both a study of philosophy and opportunities for the students to engage our younger (middle and lower) students in age appropriate philosophical texts and discussions. The accommodations for participants were very comfortable.  Most of the world class campus facilities were opened to everyone.  The central campus, with the Rotunda and Lawn (and where the seminar took place) provides a unique reflection of the enlightened influences on Thomas Jefferson, founder and designer of the original Grounds.  In the three weeks of the program, participants took a hike in the Blue ridge Mountains, visited Jefferson’s home, Monticello,  and James Madison’s home, Montpelier, traveled to nearby wineries, including Dave Mathews’ winery just outside Charlottesville, among other adventures.”

“What was especially useful as a teacher of Senior Project, a workshop in research, writing and public speaking that all of our seniors complete was the emphasis on healthy skepticism and the need for rational proof for assertions. Asking the simple question: “How do you know that?” or “What do you base that on?” became my mantra this term. In my course this fall I incorporated readings by Clifford and Michael Sandel. The fact that many students choose contemporary topics to investigate that have an ethical component made our discussions of ethical dilemmas especially relevant. The sessions where we had an opportunity to talk to colleagues about their classrooms, goals and practices were especially helpful and enriching. Guest speakers for individual topics created variety and provided a good overview of contemporary issues in philosophy today.”

  • Abby Chill,
  • Walworth Barbour American International School,
  • Kiryat Ono, Israel

“Thank you again for such an inspiring and informative three weeks.  The material has proven to be very helpful in guiding my students in philosophy.  The Institute provided such depth of resources and food for thought, so that two years later I find myself developing new units influenced by our readings and discussions.  Students have benefitted both from “engaging philosophy” and developing effective argument skills. In fact, yesterday a student who is President of our Philosophy Club said, “When I try to come up with discussion topics for club meetings, I just think about what we did in AP Language today.”

  • Sharon Hanson,
  • Boise High School,
  • Boise, Idaho

(collapse and return to top)

Other Details

Individual Appointments

I will hold “office hours” for 45 minutes before some of the morning sessions, and again during our lunch break. These will be 8-8:45 a.m., and 12:30-1:15 p.m., and will be held on two days of each week. During the first week of the Institute, I will schedule fifteen-minute individual conferences with Institute participants. I will do the same again during the final week of the Institute. Additional appointments can be made as needed.

Academic Resources

All NEH Summer Scholars will have borrowing privileges at the main University libraries, as well as wifi access to the Internet while on campus.

Credit

Some NEH Summer Scholars may wish to receive Continuing Education credit for their work. If you would like to do so, please make us aware of this fact after being accepted for participation in the Institute. Within reasonable limits, we will help to facilitate this.

Status of NEH Summer Scholars at the University of Virginia

While enrolled in the Institute, all NEH Summer Scholars will have the status of Visiting Scholars at the University.

(collapse and return to top)

Application Procedure and Deadline

How-to

If you wish to apply to the Institute, please be sure to read the NEH’s application instructions and criteria, where you will also find out how to go about submitting your application: https://securegrants.neh.gov/education/participants/.

The essay that you submit as part of this process will be given a great deal of weight by the selection committee, so in it please be sure to explain the nature of your interest in the Epic Questions Institute, your relevant qualifications, as well as how you hope to use the knowledge and skills gained from it in enhancing what you do in the classroom. Please let us emphasize again, however, that you need not have studied philosophy before this point in order to be a competitive candidate for admission to the Epic Questions Institute.

As part of your application, you need to secure two reference letters. Please ask your recommenders to sign their name across the flap of their letter to ensure confidentiality. You must submit their letters with your application.

Deadline & Submission

Your application must be postmarked no later than midnight on March 4, 2013. It should be sent to:

  • NEH Epic Questions Institute
  • c/o Professor Mitchell Green
  • 120 Cocke Hall
  • Department of Philosophy
  • University of Virginia
  • Charlottesville, VA 22904-4780

The application cover sheet must be filled out online by clicking here. Please follow the instructions for filling it out and submitting it. You will also need to print it out before clicking the ‘submit’ button and use it as the cover sheet for your application package.

(collapse and return to top)

Contact

Manual

If you have any questions, please write to: epicquestionsneh@gmail.com. Thank you again for your interest in the Epic Questions Institute. My colleagues and I look forward to hearing from you!

  • Mitchell S. Green
  • NEH/Horace Goldsmith
  • Distinguished Teaching Professor
  • Department of Philosophy
  • University of Virginia

Form

If you’d prefer filling out our contact form, please head over to our contact page.

(collapse and return to top)
« Regress to Forum Continue to SMO »